ECOOP'25 30. June - 4. July 2025, Bergen/Norway: multiple submission rounds
ECOOP is Europe’s longest-standing annual Programming Languages conference, bringing together researchers, practitioners, and students to share their ideas and experiences in all topics related to programming languages, software development, systems and applications. ECOOP welcomes high quality research papers relating to these fields in a broad sense.
Mon 6 Jan 2025: Round 1 Submissions
Wed 5 Mar 2025: Round 2 Submissions
In 2025, ECOOP will be hosted by the Software Engineering research group at the Høgskulen på Vestlandet (Western Norway University of Applied Sciences) in Bergen, Norway, between June 30th and July 4th. More information can be found on the conference website: https://2025.ecoop.org
ECOOP is committed to affordable open access publishing. Recent year’s publications have been published by Dagstuhl’s LIPIcs series under a Creative Commons CC-BY license where the authors retain their copyright. ECOOP articles have been published without open access publishing fee and can be accessed via a DOI. LIPIcs is indexed in DBLP, Google Scholar, Scopus and others.
Important Dates
Mon 6 Jan 2025: Round 1 Submissions
Mon 17 - Tue 18 Feb 2025: Round 1 Author response deadline
Fri 28 Feb 2025: Round 1 Notification
Wed 5 Mar 2025: Round 2 Submissions
Tue 8 - Thu 10 Apr 2025: Round 2 Author response deadline
Fri 25 Apr 2025: Round 2 Notification
Mon 30 Jun 09:00 - Wed 2 Jul 18:00 2025: Main conference
Submissions
Submissions will be done through HotCRP but are not yet open at the time of this writing. Authors are asked to pick one of the following paper categories:
Research. The most traditional category for papers that advance the state of the art.
Replication. An empirical evaluation that reconstructs a published experiment in a different context in order to validate the results of that earlier work.
Experience. Applications of known PL techniques in practice as well as tools. Industry papers will be reviewed by practitioners. We welcome negative results that may provide inspiration for future research.
Pearls/Brave New Ideas. Articles that either explain a known idea in an elegant way or unconventional papers introducing ideas that may take some time to substantiate. These papers may be short.
Submission must not have been published, or have major overlap with previous work. In case of doubt, contact the PC chairs (listed below). Proceedings will be published in open access by Dagstuhl LIPIcs in the Dagstuhl LIPIcs LaTeX-style template (https://submission.dagstuhl.de/series/details/LIPIcs#author). To reduce friction when resubmitting, ACM’s PACMPL and TOPLAS formatted papers can be submitted as such (with the understanding that if accepted, they will need to be reformatted and reduced to the page limit).
ECOOP uses double-anonymous reviewing. Authors’ identities are only revealed if a paper is accepted. Papers must omit author names and institutions, and use the third person when referencing the authors’ own work. Nothing should be done in the name of anonymity that weakens the submission; see the FAQ. If in doubt, contact the chairs.
There is no page limit on submissions, but authors must understand that reviewers have a fixed time budget for each paper, so the length of the feedback is likely to be unaffected by length. Brevity is a virtue. Authors also have to consider that the camera-ready version must be (at most) 25 pages in LIPIcs format (not including references).
Authors will be given a three-day period to read and respond to the reviews of their papers before the program committee meeting. Responses have no length limit.
ECOOP will continue to have two deadlines for submissions. Papers submitted in each round can be (a) accepted, (b) rejected, or (c) asked for revisions. Rejected papers that are submitted to the immediate next round can be desk-rejected if they do not sufficiently differ from the previous submission. Revisions can be submitted at any later round. Papers retain their reviewers during revision.
Review Criteria
Each paper will be evaluated based on the following criteria:
Soundness: How well the paper’s contributions are supported by rigorous application of appropriate research methods;
Significance: The extent to which the paper’s contributions are novel, original, and important, with respect to the existing body of knowledge;
Presentation: Whether the paper’s quality of writing meets the high standards of ECOOP.
After author response and reviewer discussion, papers will be accepted if the PC decides that the paper meets our high bar for Soundness and Presentation, and if one reviewer judges the paper to meet the bar for Significance. The goal of this process is to ensure quality of writing and confidence in results, while assuming that if one reviewer finds the paper to be significant then there will be readers who do so as well.
Artifact Evaluation and Intent
To support replication of experiments, authors of research papers may submit artifacts to the Artifact Evaluation Committee. They will be asked whether they intend to submit an artifact at submission time. It is understood that some papers do not have artifacts. AEC members will serve on the extended review committee.
Journal First and Journal After
We have Journal First/After arrangements with ACM’s Transactions on Programming Languages and Systems (TOPLAS), Elsevier’s Science of Computer Programming (SCP) and AITO’s Journal of Object Technology (JOT).
Only new research papers are eligible to be Journal First (JF). JF papers will have an extended abstract in the ECOOP proceedings. The deadline is the same as Round 1 of submissions and the notification is aligned with Round 2 notification. TOPLAS JF papers should be submitted according to this announcement. SCP JF papers should follow this call for papers. JF papers are presented at the conference and eligible for awards.
Journal After (JA) papers are papers for which the authors request to be considered for post conference journal publication. Once accepted by the ECOOP PC, these papers will be forwarded to the journal editors. Reviews and reviewers will be forwarded and used at the editor’s discretion. JA papers will have an extended abstract (up to 12 pages) in the conference proceedings.
Program Committee
Chairs:
Jonathan Aldrich, Carnegie Mellon University, United States
Alexandra Silva, Cornell University, United States
Members:
Elvira Albert, Complutense University of Madrid, Spain
Aaron Bembenek, University of Melbourne, Australia
Einar Broch Johnsen, University of Oslo, Norway
Luís Caires, University of Lisbon, Portugal
Farzaneh Derakhshan, Illinois Institute of Technology, United States
Werner Dietl, University of Waterloo, Canada
Sophia Drossopoulou, Imperial College London, United Kingdom
Serena Elisa Ponta, SAP Security Research
Sebastian Erdweg, JGU Mainz, Germany
João F. Ferreira, University of Lisbon, Portugal
Carla Ferreira, NOVA University Lisbon, Portugal
Elisa Gonzalez Boix, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Belgium
Ping Hou, University of Oxford, United Kingdom
Jules Jacobs, Cornell University, United States
Sung-Shik Jongmans, Open University of the Netherlands, Netherlands
Robbert Krebbers, Radboud University Nijmegen, Netherlands
Mira Mezini, TU Darmstadt, Germany
Daniele Nantes-Sobrinho, Imperial College London, United Kingdom
Federico Olmedo, University of Chile, Chile
Albert Rubio, Complutense University of Madrid, Spain
Peter Thiemann, University of Freiburg, Germany
Niki Vazou, IMDEA Software Institute
Michael Vollmer, University of Kent, United Kingdom
Di Wang, Peking University, China
Pascal Weisenburger, University of St. Gallen, Switzerland
Max Willsey, UC Berkeley, United States
Tobias Wrigstad, Uppsala University, Sweden
Jingling Xue, UNSW Sydney, Australia
Wenjia Ye, National University of Singapore, Singapore
Lingming Zhang, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, United States